XANSYS Message: 93195 [Go back to message list]
[bookmark on del.icio.us]
No rating yet
Rate item:

Subject: Re: [Other] GKH modulus
Author: Chris Masterson
Date: 2008-05-06 21:38:14

Wow! 30% is more than I had imagined. If you had said 5 or 10% I
wouldn't have been too surprised, despite my earlier emails but 30% might
as well be an entirely different material. I worked in the fatigue group
at deHavilland in Toronto for a while and spot checking fatigue properties
for materials was part of the testing we did so I was well aware of the
large scatter in fatigue data. But 30% variation of the modulus....yeesh!

Regards,
Chris Masterson
Toyota Racing Development



"McGlaun, Monte"
Sent by: xansys-bounces_at_xansys.org
05/06/2008 01:24 PM
Please respond to
ANSYS User Discussion List


To
"ANSYS User Discussion List"
cc

Subject
Re: [Xansys] [XANSYS][Other] GKH modulus






Another observation related to scatter. Every material I have had
tested to obtain stress strain data has had variations from test to test
in Young's modulus. This occurred at different labs and with different
materials. Up to 30% variation! So much for constants.

What this means for a critical, dynamically tuned structure is that it
is possible to see big differences between our calculations and the
performance of the production assembly. Or we may see differences from
one assembly to the other if they are made from different material lots.

Monte A. McGlaun, Staff Engineer
Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., Fort Worth, TX


^--------------------------------------------------------

^--------------------------------------------------------
| XANSYS - www.xansys.org |
| The Discussion List for users of ANSYS, Inc. Software |
| Hosted by PADT - www.padtinc.com |
^--------------------------------------------------------


Posts possibly associated with message #93195AuthorDateScore
93157[Other] GKH modulusChris Masterson2008/05/05 
93168Re: [Other] GKH modulusJan Christian Anker2008/05/06 
93169Re: [Other] GKH modulusJan Christian Anker2008/05/06 
93170Re: [Other] GKH modulusRick Fischer2008/05/06 
93171Re: [Other] GKH modulusRick Fischer2008/05/06 
93172Re: [Other] GKH modulusJan Christian Anker2008/05/06 
93173Re: [Other] GKH modulusJan Christian Anker2008/05/06 
93174Re: [Other] GKH modulusRick Fischer2008/05/06 
93175Re: [Other] GKH modulusRick Fischer2008/05/06 
93176Re: [Other] GKH modulusJan Christian Anker2008/05/06 
93177Re: [Other] GKH modulusJan Christian Anker2008/05/06 
93181Re: [Other] GKH modulusChris Masterson2008/05/06 
93182Re: [Other] GKH modulusChris Masterson2008/05/06 
93183Re: [Other] GKH modulusParis Altidis2008/05/06 
93184Re: [Other] GKH modulusCarlos Shultz2008/05/06 
93185Re: [Other] GKH modulusChristopher Wright2008/05/06 
93186Re: [Other] GKH modulusCarl Mally2008/05/06 
93187Re: [Other] GKH modulusChris Masterson2008/05/06 
93188Re: [Other] GKH modulusChris Masterson2008/05/06 
93189Re: [Other] GKH modulusChris Masterson2008/05/06 
93191Re: [Other] GKH modulusRick Fischer2008/05/06 
93192Re: [Other] GKH modulusRick Fischer2008/05/06 
93194Re: [Other] GKH modulusMonte McGlaun2008/05/06 
93195Re: [Other] GKH modulusChris Masterson2008/05/06 
93196Re: [Other] GKH modulusChris Masterson2008/05/06 
93197Re: [Other] GKH modulusChristopher Wright2008/05/06 
93210Re: [Other] GKH modulusDavid Stapp2008/05/07 
93219Re: [Other] GKH modulusChristopher Wright2008/05/07 
93224Re: [Other] GKH modulusMonte McGlaun2008/05/07 
93225Re: ***SPAM*** Re: [Other] GKH modulusFernand Thomassy2008/05/07 
93226Re: ***SPAM*** Re: [Other] GKH modulusYoshio Muki2008/05/07