XANSYS Message: 93183 [Go back to message list]
[bookmark on del.icio.us]
No rating yet
Rate item:

Subject: Re: [Other] GKH modulus
Author: Paris Altidis
Date: 2008-05-06 17:29:48

Chris,
It is the vicious cycle: Who gets the mat information from Whom and the
associated data entry error propagation in the system. For your case,
1% delta in density does make a difference. For the most apps it is a
matter of reference as long as the information is not too far off. In
all honesty, I'm not sure whether we should be trusting the vendor
datasheets more than the posted props on Matweb. In theory, Vendor info
should be most accurate - In practice,ah, that's a different story.
Time and time again this hasn't been the case and I bet a good deal of
XANSYS members have been burned by the vendor-supplied info. The
ultimate is to test the material at hand, sampling many batches &
suppliers BUT who has the time and $$$ for that.
Case in point: during my previous employment in the automotive industry
we used to have thin hot rolled steel that due to rolling experienced
different cooling rates from the center to the edges. That reason
alone affected material properties and performance that didn't become
apparent until we did a 100 % material audit.

I'm sure others will chime in with similar experiences.

Regards,

Paris Altidis
BELCAN Engineering Group
Adv. Engineering & Technology Division
630-786-0008
==============================
The human bio neural net excels because of:
-Planning ; -Perseverance ; -Passion ; -Pictures!
Alex. H. Slocum - MIT
-It is the privilege of knowledge to speak and it is the privilege of
wisdom to listen."
Oliver Wendell Holmes




-----Original Message-----
From: xansys-bounces_at_xansys.org [mailto:xansys-bounces_at_xansys.org] On
Behalf Of Chris_Masterson_at_Toyota.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 12:12 PM
To: ANSYS User Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Xansys] [XANSYS][Other] GKH modulus

Incidentally, I just happened to check another steel grade on Matweb for
which I already have a data sheet from the manufacturer. The density
listed on Matweb is different from what the manufacturers data sheet
claims. The difference is only about 1% but that is sufficient to cause
problems when trying to design as close as possible to minimum weight
rules. Leaves me wondering how many other times I have trusted Matweb
too much in the absence of proper vendor datasheets.

Regards,
Chris Masterson
Toyota Racing Development



rick.fischer_at_emersonnetworkpower.com
Sent by: xansys-bounces_at_xansys.org
05/06/2008 06:14 AM
Please respond to
ANSYS User Discussion List


To
ANSYS User Discussion List
cc

Subject
Re: [Xansys] [XANSYS][Other] GKH modulus







I dont see Young's Modulus listed, but there is a data sheet on page 28.

The composition is listed a the top of the page. Try and match that up
with another material on MatWeb. It's a fair bet that similar
chemistries

will result in similar structure and similar Young's Modulus.

http://www.lugandaciers.com/1023/fr/base/LA-Cata2006FRv2.pdf

Rick Fischer
Principal Engineer
Emerson Network Power



^--------------------------------------------------------
| XANSYS - www.xansys.org |
| The Discussion List for users of ANSYS, Inc. Software |
| Hosted by PADT - www.padtinc.com |
^--------------------------------------------------------

This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be
privileged. It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you receive
this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any manner.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or
use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please reply to the
message immediately by informing the sender that the message was misdirected.
After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your assistance in
correcting this error is appreciated.

^--------------------------------------------------------
| XANSYS - www.xansys.org |
| The Discussion List for users of ANSYS, Inc. Software |
| Hosted by PADT - www.padtinc.com |
^--------------------------------------------------------


Posts possibly associated with message #93183AuthorDateScore
93157[Other] GKH modulusChris Masterson2008/05/05 
93168Re: [Other] GKH modulusJan Christian Anker2008/05/06 
93169Re: [Other] GKH modulusJan Christian Anker2008/05/06 
93170Re: [Other] GKH modulusRick Fischer2008/05/06 
93171Re: [Other] GKH modulusRick Fischer2008/05/06 
93172Re: [Other] GKH modulusJan Christian Anker2008/05/06 
93173Re: [Other] GKH modulusJan Christian Anker2008/05/06 
93174Re: [Other] GKH modulusRick Fischer2008/05/06 
93175Re: [Other] GKH modulusRick Fischer2008/05/06 
93176Re: [Other] GKH modulusJan Christian Anker2008/05/06 
93177Re: [Other] GKH modulusJan Christian Anker2008/05/06 
93181Re: [Other] GKH modulusChris Masterson2008/05/06 
93182Re: [Other] GKH modulusChris Masterson2008/05/06 
93183Re: [Other] GKH modulusParis Altidis2008/05/06 
93184Re: [Other] GKH modulusCarlos Shultz2008/05/06 
93185Re: [Other] GKH modulusChristopher Wright2008/05/06 
93186Re: [Other] GKH modulusCarl Mally2008/05/06 
93187Re: [Other] GKH modulusChris Masterson2008/05/06 
93188Re: [Other] GKH modulusChris Masterson2008/05/06 
93189Re: [Other] GKH modulusChris Masterson2008/05/06 
93191Re: [Other] GKH modulusRick Fischer2008/05/06 
93192Re: [Other] GKH modulusRick Fischer2008/05/06 
93194Re: [Other] GKH modulusMonte McGlaun2008/05/06 
93195Re: [Other] GKH modulusChris Masterson2008/05/06 
93196Re: [Other] GKH modulusChris Masterson2008/05/06 
93197Re: [Other] GKH modulusChristopher Wright2008/05/06 
93210Re: [Other] GKH modulusDavid Stapp2008/05/07 
93219Re: [Other] GKH modulusChristopher Wright2008/05/07 
93224Re: [Other] GKH modulusMonte McGlaun2008/05/07 
93225Re: ***SPAM*** Re: [Other] GKH modulusFernand Thomassy2008/05/07 
93226Re: ***SPAM*** Re: [Other] GKH modulusYoshio Muki2008/05/07