XANSYS Message: 38498 [Go back to message list]
[bookmark on del.icio.us]
No rating yet
Rate item:

Subject: Re: optimization problem
Author: Muralidhara D. N muralidhara.d@
Date: 2002-06-05 03:55:00

Hi Rick

If the model is created in pro/e sheet metal option,then there
is no problem in getting the surfaces into ansys and meshing by
shell elemnts,there by toggling with real constant values,we can arrive
at an optimum thickness with in the specified limits of stress and
deflection.

But if we have a casting model of irregular geometry,modeled in
proe,imported
to ansys with volumes ,meshed with tetrahedral elements(10 noded solid
92 elements),
and then if i want to optmize the component for range of stress,
how do i proceede in this case??

Thanks in advance
Murali
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:25 PM
To: xansys@yahoogroups.com

If your part was created in the sheet metal module. the midplane is
generated automatically. This is true also for parts made by shelling,
and
there may be others. This functionality is found under Mechanica,
Structure, Model, Idealizations, Shells, Midsurfaces, Autodetect. If
the
part is just thin 3-D geometry that looks like sheet metal, them the
midsurface is generated by manually "pairing" faces to collapse to the
midplane. This is done with Mechanica, Structure, Model, Idealizations,
Shells, Midsurfaces, New.
This functionality used to be part of ProMesh. ProMesh is gone, and the
functionality has been buried in Mechanica to force you to buy
Mechanica,
even it you use Ansys. But, existing ProMesh customers were had their
seats grandfathered in, at least for a while, so you might have it
available. We lost Promesh when we went to Pro2001, but I'm not sure
if
that was because ProMesh went away, or if it was an oversight by the CAD
administrator.

Rick Fischer
Marconi

mark.hommel@u... on 06/03/2002 08:26:13 AM

To: xansys@yahoogroups.com
cc:

Murali,
How did you import the Pro/E model as a mid-surface shell model into
ANSYS?
Was
it a 3-D model to begin with? My Pro/E experts over here haven't
figured
out
how to do that yet.
Mark Hommel, P.E., Ph.D.
Senior Engineer
ABB Offshore Systems Inc.
Houston, TX

|(Embedded |
|image moved |
|to file: |
|pic00214.pcx)|

|Markus Lengauer

|06/03/2002 06:37 AM

To: xansys@yahoogroups.com
cc: (bcc: Mark Hommel/USOFS/ABB)

If the only geometric parameter to be changed is the sheet thickness,
then you just have to define the thickness value in the real
constant sets for the shell elements as optimization variables.

You have to define different real constant sets for each shell element
or for each section, if preferred. Otherwise the whole
model will be optimized for a unique thickness.

The creation of the real sets should be performed via *DO Loop after
meshing with a dummy real set.

Regards,
Markus

Muralidhara D. N wrote:

>Hi Ansys users

>I have a sheet metal component of 1.8mm thick and the cad model is
>imported from
>pro/e to ansys as mid surface.i have done the static analysis for the
>component and
>the stress levels are much well with in the yeild stress for the
>material.

>now i want to do the optimization for the component keeping stress and
>deflections as
>variables, and then optimizing the sheet thickness.

>now my problem is, how do i defeine these variable while doing
>optimization??because, i have'nt
>done the geometric modeling in ansys using parameters.

>could any one let me know regarding this.

>Murali
>HCL Tech
>Blore
>muralidhara.d@s...

Dipl.-Ing. Markus Lengauer - Technische Berechnung
Studiengang Fahrzeugtechnik / Automotive Engineering
FH JOANNEUM Gesellschaft mbH
Alte Post Strasse 149, A-8020 Graz
Tel.: 0043 (0)316 5453 8413
Fax: 0043 (0)316 5453 8401
e-mail: markus.lengauer@f...
visit our homepage: www.fh-joanneum.at


Posts possibly associated with message #38498AuthorDateScore
20874Optimization ProblemVijaykumar Ramalingam2001/02/07 
20877Re: Optimization ProblemStan Schwantes2001/02/07 
20878Re: Optimization ProblemRick Fischer2001/02/07 
20889Re: Optimization ProblemVijaykumar Ramalingam2001/02/07 
20893Re: Optimization ProblemShen-Yeh Chen2001/02/07 
20912Re: Optimization ProblemVijaykumar Ramalingam2001/02/08 
20924Re: Optimization ProblemFrank Exius2001/02/08 
20928Re: Optimization ProblemShen-Yeh Chen2001/02/08 
38380optimization problemMuralidhara D. N muralidhara.d@2002/06/03 
38381Re: optimization problemMarkus Lengauer2002/06/03 
38386Re: optimization problemuma umamaheswary@2002/06/03 
38387Re: optimization problemMark Hommel2002/06/03 
38390Re: optimization problemBogdan Balasa2002/06/03 
38391Re: optimization problemRick Fischer2002/06/03 
38392Re: optimization problemRick Fischer2002/06/03 
38426Re: optimization problemMuralidhara D. N muralidhara.d@2002/06/04 
38427Re: optimization problemMuralidhara D. N muralidhara.d@2002/06/04 
38435Re: optimization problemAntonio L. Negron2002/06/04 
38436Re: optimization problemAntonio L. Negron2002/06/04 
38498Re: optimization problemMuralidhara D. N muralidhara.d@2002/06/05 
38504Re: optimization problemRick Fischer2002/06/05 
38534Re: optimization problemRavi Krishna2002/06/06 
74247optimization problemWijono Moedjani2005/01/28 
74255Re: optimization problemRoberto Porto2005/01/28 
74287Re: optimization problemWijono Moedjani2005/01/31