XANSYS Message: 34719 [Go back to message list]
[bookmark on del.icio.us]
No rating yet
Rate item:

Subject: Re: Regarding substructuring
Author: Herbert Liu
Date: 2002-03-08 10:12:00

I have not used substructuring for quite some time. At least not after the
iterative solver became available. I remember the substructure requires the
generation of FULL stiffness matrix at the size of master dof's instead of
the diagonal matrices in regular FEA structure models. The rule of thumb (at
least back then) was limiting your master dof's to no more than few
hundreds. Does anyone know the approximate value of "# of master DOF's per
Gb RAM" in running substructure ?

Herbert Liu
CAE Team Leader
Index Development Engineering
HUSKY INJECTION MOLDING SYSTEMS
(905) 951-5000 x2483
hliu@h...

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 3:16 PM
To: xansys

Again we have a confusion. I have a big volume having 90000 elements.
I have selected only boundary nodes those are around 3000. I have around
9000master dof's. But the system is creating a huge page file and its not
solving in the gereration pass.

Thanks

Regards

Somesh

At 09:04 AM 3/7/02 -0500, you wrote:
> I don't understand "the frontal solver can solve only 50000 DOFs" -
>there
>is no such limit. Perhaps you mean what the solver can only handle 50000
>master DOFs? If so, this sounds like an extremely large number. Is it
>possible
>that you have set all DOFs to be masters rather than just some boundary or
>loading nodes?
>John Swanson
>Swanson Analysis Services, Inc.

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Somesh J. Ghunakikar [SMTP:someshjg@i...]
>> Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 9:11 PM
>> To: xansys
>> Subject: RE: [xansys] Regarding substructuring

>> I have a single volume meshed with 50000 elements, I can not solve in
>> generation pass, its coming out by giving watson error. Since the frontal
>> solver can solve only 50000 DOF's. The problem is I can not divide the
>> volume also.
>> Again in the use pass, while solving its taking only frontal solver. But
I
>> need atleast sparse. I need an iterative solver in the use pass. How I
can
>> do it.

>> Thanks

>> Regards

>> Somesh

>> IEL, Hyd.
>> India

>> At 08:01 AM 07/03/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>> > A slightly longer answer is that substructure generation is a partial
>> >factoring of the set
>> >of equations, down to the set of Master DOFS. The other solvers in
>> ANSYS,
>> >both iterative
>> >and direct, do not have this capability, which leaves you with the
>> frontal
>> >solver.
>> > Direct solvers might be modified to have this capability (Sparse,
for
>> >example), but I have
>> >not seen any research on how this might be done with an iterative
solver.
>> >John Swanson
>> >Swanson Analysis Services, Inc.

>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Bohlen, Dan (GEAE) [SMTP:dan.bohlen@a...]
>> >> Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:33 AM
>> >> To: 'xansys '
>> >> Subject: RE: [xansys] Regarding substructuring

>> >> I believe the short answer is: you can't.

>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Somesh J. Ghunakikar [mailto:someshjg@i...]
>> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 6:14 PM
>> >> To: xansys
>> >> Subject: [xansys] Regarding substructuring

>> >> Dear Users
>> >> In substructuring , the generation pass has only frontal solver? How
>> we
>> >> can change the solver instead of frontal in generation pass.

>> >> Thanks

>> >> Regards

>> >> Somesh

>> >> IEL Hyd. India


Posts possibly associated with message #34719AuthorDateScore
34548Regarding substructuringSomesh J. Ghunakikar2002/03/05 
34565Regarding substructuringSomesh J. Ghunakikar2002/03/05 
34616Re: Regarding substructuringDan Bohlen2002/03/06 
34655Re: Regarding substructuringJohn Swanson2002/03/07 
34656Re: Regarding substructuringSomesh J. Ghunakikar2002/03/07 
34658Re: Regarding substructuringJohn Swanson2002/03/07 
34714Re: Regarding substructuringSomesh J. Ghunakikar2002/03/08 
34717Re: Regarding substructuringSomesh J. Ghunakikar2002/03/08 
34718Re: Regarding substructuringDan Bohlen2002/03/08 
34719Re: Regarding substructuringHerbert Liu2002/03/08 
34720Re: Regarding substructuringSomesh J. Ghunakikar2002/03/08 
34721Re: Regarding substructuringDan Bohlen2002/03/08 
34722Re: Regarding substructuringDan Militaru2002/03/08 
34724Re: Regarding substructuringSomesh J. Ghunakikar2002/03/08 
34751Re: Regarding substructuringRiccardo Testi2002/03/11 
34769Re: Regarding substructuringChristopher Wright1970/01/01