XANSYS Message: 34714 [Go back to message list]
[bookmark on del.icio.us]
No rating yet
Rate item:

Subject: Re: Regarding substructuring
Author: Somesh J. Ghunakikar
Date: 2002-03-08 21:57:00

Again we have a confusion. I have a big volume having 90000 elements.
I have selected only boundary nodes those are around 3000. I have around
9000master dof's. But the system is creating a huge page file and its not
solving in the gereration pass.

Thanks

Regards

Somesh

At 09:04 AM 3/7/02 -0500, you wrote:
> I don't understand "the frontal solver can solve only 50000 DOFs" -
>there
>is no such limit. Perhaps you mean what the solver can only handle 50000
>master DOFs? If so, this sounds like an extremely large number. Is it
>possible
>that you have set all DOFs to be masters rather than just some boundary or
>loading nodes?
>John Swanson
>Swanson Analysis Services, Inc.

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Somesh J. Ghunakikar [SMTP:someshjg@i...]
>> Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 9:11 PM
>> To: xansys
>> Subject: RE: [xansys] Regarding substructuring

>> I have a single volume meshed with 50000 elements, I can not solve in
>> generation pass, its coming out by giving watson error. Since the frontal
>> solver can solve only 50000 DOF's. The problem is I can not divide the
>> volume also.
>> Again in the use pass, while solving its taking only frontal solver. But I
>> need atleast sparse. I need an iterative solver in the use pass. How I can
>> do it.

>> Thanks

>> Regards

>> Somesh

>> IEL, Hyd.
>> India

>> At 08:01 AM 07/03/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>> > A slightly longer answer is that substructure generation is a partial
>> >factoring of the set
>> >of equations, down to the set of Master DOFS. The other solvers in
>> ANSYS,
>> >both iterative
>> >and direct, do not have this capability, which leaves you with the
>> frontal
>> >solver.
>> > Direct solvers might be modified to have this capability (Sparse, for
>> >example), but I have
>> >not seen any research on how this might be done with an iterative solver.
>> >John Swanson
>> >Swanson Analysis Services, Inc.

>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Bohlen, Dan (GEAE) [SMTP:dan.bohlen@a...]
>> >> Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:33 AM
>> >> To: 'xansys '
>> >> Subject: RE: [xansys] Regarding substructuring

>> >> I believe the short answer is: you can't.

>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Somesh J. Ghunakikar [mailto:someshjg@i...]
>> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 6:14 PM
>> >> To: xansys
>> >> Subject: [xansys] Regarding substructuring

>> >> Dear Users
>> >> In substructuring , the generation pass has only frontal solver? How
>> we
>> >> can change the solver instead of frontal in generation pass.

>> >> Thanks

>> >> Regards

>> >> Somesh

>> >> IEL Hyd. India


Posts possibly associated with message #34714AuthorDateScore
34548Regarding substructuringSomesh J. Ghunakikar2002/03/05 
34565Regarding substructuringSomesh J. Ghunakikar2002/03/05 
34616Re: Regarding substructuringDan Bohlen2002/03/06 
34655Re: Regarding substructuringJohn Swanson2002/03/07 
34656Re: Regarding substructuringSomesh J. Ghunakikar2002/03/07 
34658Re: Regarding substructuringJohn Swanson2002/03/07 
34714Re: Regarding substructuringSomesh J. Ghunakikar2002/03/08 
34717Re: Regarding substructuringSomesh J. Ghunakikar2002/03/08 
34718Re: Regarding substructuringDan Bohlen2002/03/08 
34719Re: Regarding substructuringHerbert Liu2002/03/08 
34720Re: Regarding substructuringSomesh J. Ghunakikar2002/03/08 
34721Re: Regarding substructuringDan Bohlen2002/03/08 
34722Re: Regarding substructuringDan Militaru2002/03/08 
34724Re: Regarding substructuringSomesh J. Ghunakikar2002/03/08 
34751Re: Regarding substructuringRiccardo Testi2002/03/11 
34769Re: Regarding substructuringChristopher Wright1970/01/01