XANSYS Message: 20783 [Go back to message list]
[bookmark on del.icio.us]
No rating yet
Rate item:

Subject: Re: Superelement in ANSYS/Substructuring
Author: Christopher Wright
Date: 2001-02-02 10:08:00

>Whereas submodeling is based on St. Venant principle , substructuring is not.
I wasn't very clear. I should have said that the usefulness of
substructuring in the application would depend on the St Venant
principle. In effect both a submodelling approach and a substructuring
approach use the full model to privide boundary conditions for the
sub-model.

Christopher Wright P.E. |"They couldn't hit an elephant from
chrisw@s... | this distance" (last words of Gen.
___________________________| John Sedgwick, Spotsylvania 1864)
http://www.skypoint.com/~chrisw

Posts possibly associated with message #20783AuthorDateScore
20651Superelement in ANSYS/Substructuringsbordas@2001/01/30 
20655Re: Superelement in ANSYS/SubstructuringMark Rodamaker2001/01/30 
20659Re: Superelement in ANSYS/SubstructuringK.S. Raghavan2001/01/30-10
20724Re: Superelement in ANSYS/SubstructuringChristopher Wright2001/01/31 
20730Re: Superelement in ANSYS/SubstructuringK.S. Raghavan2001/02/01 
20735Re: Superelement in ANSYS/SubstructuringJason Husband2001/02/01 
20740Re: Superelement in ANSYS/SubstructuringChristopher Wright1991/02/01 
20742Re: Superelement in ANSYS/SubstructuringOsman Buyukisik2001/02/01 
20747Re: Superelement in ANSYS/SubstructuringChristopher Wright1991/02/01 
20768Re: Superelement in ANSYS/SubstructuringK.S. Raghavan2001/02/02 
20783Re: Superelement in ANSYS/SubstructuringChristopher Wright2001/02/02