XANSYS Message: 182 [Go back to message list]
[bookmark on del.icio.us]
No rating yet
Subject: Re: TCHG Command
Author: John Swanson
Date: 1999-01-11 20:19:00Suggest using EQSLVE,PCG to get rid to the .tri file.
John
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hemmele, Raymond [SMTP:Raymond.Hemmele@a...]
> Sent: Monday, January 11, 1999 5:53 PM
> To: ANSYS Users List
> Subject: [xansys] TCHG Command
> From: "Hemmele, Raymond"
> I have some peculiar results regarding the use of the TCHG command for
> converting 95's to 92's. The command seems to work as advertised in
> 5.5 and appears to work(although undocumented) in 5.4....Certainly for
> computational efficiency, it seems like a deal. However, in 5.4, the
> use of TCHG took what would be a 2.2 Gb TRI file and made it 7.2 Gb !
> The active number of DOFs did go down.
> Anybody else see this happen in 5.4?
> Ray Hemmele
> AlliedSignal Engines
| Posts possibly associated with message #182 | Author | Date | Score |
|---|
| 181 | TCHG Command | Raymond Hemmele | 1999/01/11 | |
| 182 | Re: TCHG Command | John Swanson | 1999/01/11 | |