XANSYS Message: 161 [Go back to message list]
[bookmark on del.icio.us]
Average Rating: 5 (1 votes)
Rate item:

Subject: Re: A Very Basic Question
Author: Peter Budgell
Date: 1999-01-08 18:13:00

The question of when to use element versus nodal averaged stresses, of
course, "depends."

If you use the AVRES command (with PowerGraphics) you can optionally get
discontinuity of the stresses at changes of element REAL value, and
element MAT (material) value. PowerGraphics also plots with
discontinuity of stress with events such as shell elements meeting at an
angle. This can make it possible to get improved information about
high-stress regions, while getting the "cleaner" appearance of nodal
stress averaging away from intersections.

Fatigue analysis techniques (in my limited experience) will be industry
dependent. An average stress might be taken from the FEA work, and
factors applied that are load, industry, material, and connection method
dependent. A more exact stress may be taken from a very fine element
mesh and examined using other rules. Fracture analysis may be indicated.
With a good very fine element mesh, the elemental and nodal stresses
should be similar with acceptably shaped elements, except at the
intersections of the type addressed by PowerGraphics and AVRES. If the
stresses are not similar, you may want a locally finer mesh and/or
better element shapes for certain fatigue work.

Nodal averaged stresses may wash out local stress variation caused by
element shape variation. Nodal stress averaging becomes dangerous when
it hides stresses with large elements, at intersections of shell
elements, etc. In the past, I have seen nodal stress averaging abused
with unfortunate results. If there are significant differences in
element stresses (PLESOL) and nodal averaged stresses (PLNSOL) where
fatigue is to be examined, or where stresses are high, I expect that a
finer mesh may be wanted, and PowerGraphics with AVRES should be
considered.

Peter C. Budgell pbudgell@o...
Senior Development Engineer 519-740-0757 ext.249
Innovative Steam Technologies FAX: 519-740-2051
200 Avenue Road http://www.otsg.com
Cambridge, Ontario, Canada N1R 8H5

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hursha Narayan

> Hello Everybody,

> Under what conditions should one use elemental stress as opposed to
> nodal
> stress. Is there any particular reason using elemental stress in
> fatigue
> calculations. Thanks in advance for your response.

> Regards,
> Hursha S Narayan
> Eaton Corp.


Posts possibly associated with message #161AuthorDateScore
152A Very Basic QuestionHursha Narayan1999/01/08 
161Re: A Very Basic QuestionPeter Budgell1999/01/085
171Re: A Very Basic QuestionXiao Gong1999/01/11